Adams v. Paul

Supreme Court of California · Decided 1995-11-22

Cited by 123 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

LUCAS, C. J. I dissent. We granted review of this case in order to decide when plaintiff suffered “actual injury” within the meaning of Code of Civil Procedure section 340.6, subdivision (a)(1), for purposes of tolling the limitations period applicable to her legal malpractice action. Concerned with the “numerous variables” arising in the unique context of missed-statute malpractice cases, the lead opinion has d…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.