Acton v. Deliran

Decided 1987-05-22

Cited by 107 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

STEWART, Associate Chief Justice: The Actons brought this action for rescission of a real property sales contract and restitution of amounts paid under the contract. 1 The dispute arose primarily because the land subject to the contract is landlocked and has no water. The Actons sought rescission based on fraud, misre…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.