Aced v. Hobbs-Sesack Plumbing Co.

Supreme Court of California · Decided 1961-04-06

Cited by 133 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

PETERS, J., Concurring and Dissenting. — I dissent from that portion of the majority opinion that holds that when a motion for new trial is made on several grounds, including insufficiency of the evidence, and is granted on “all issues” or “as to all the issues made by the pleadings,” such order does not adequately specify insufficiency of the evidence. I concur with all other portions of the majo…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.