Abrams v. Ohio Pacific Express

Decided 1991-11-19

Cited by 102 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

BENTON, Judge, dissenting. The principal opinion acts as if the Missouri precedents — admittedly on all fours with this case — are trivial. In fact, the principal opinion is contrary to a long line of cases, to key concepts of Missouri administrative law, and to the rules of statutory construction. I. History of “Filing” Rules in Worker’s Compensation Cases S…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.