A.H. Robins Co. v. Piccinin

U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit · Decided 1986-04-10

Cited by 660 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

DONALD RUSSELL, Circuit Judge: Confronted, if not overwhelmed, with an avalanche of actions filed in various state and federal courts throughout the United States by citizens of this country as well as of foreign countries seeking damages for injuries allegedly sustained by the use of an intrauterine contraceptive device known as a Daikon Shield, 1 the manufacturer of the device, A.H. Robins Compa…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.