3m Innovative Properties v. Tredegar Corporation

U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit · Decided 2013-08-06

Cited by 151 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

PLAGER, Circuit Judge, Concurring. I join the opinion of Judge Reyna and his claim construction conclusions. This case is yet another example—and an extreme example—of problems with claim drafting and their ensuing consequences. To resolve the question of whether the Tredegar product infringed 3M’s patents, the district court was called upon to construe some thirty separate terms, which it did in a fifty…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.