10 East 40th Street Building, Inc. v. Callus

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided 1945-06-11

Cited by 128 later decision(s) in our corpus · see the citation network in Lexace

Open in Lexace · Ask the AI about this case

From the opinion

Me. Justice Murphy, dissenting. A proper understanding of the nature of the activities carried on in petitioner’s 48-story office building in New York City leads to the inevitable conclusion that the respondent maintenance employees, like those in Kirschbaum Co. v. Walling, <a href="/opinion/103699/a-b-kirschbaum-co-v-walling/" aria-description="Citation…

Read the full opinion (source) ↗


Lexace provides legal information, not legal advice, and no attorney–client relationship is created. Citation figures are counts of later citing opinions in our corpus and may be incomplete; always read and Shepardize the full opinion before relying on it.